🔗 Share this article

Loved ones whose relatives buried in resting places at risk from shoreline retreat say that a lack of decision over how to address the problem is creating unnecessary distress about the eternal homes of their loved ones.

A Looming Danger to Ancient Churchyards

The council have singled out three church graveyards in the communities of Happisburgh, Mundesley, and Trimingham as being in danger of being consumed by the sea in the next few generations.

A newly published study on the situation sets out a range of options, from doing nothing to disinterring bodies and reburying them in more secure sites. Officials say it is for the community to decide how to proceed.

“At the moment we’re in a state of uncertainty. It causes me distress. My parents wanted this to serve as their last home, but it won't be because of the encroaching sea.”

Estimates suggest at least a portion of one churchyard could be claimed by the waves in the next 80 years, but some locals fear it will happen much sooner. “I think it’s got under 20 years, if you consider what’s occurred in the last 30 years,” a farmer stated.

Troubled by the Ghosts of Eccles

One resident recalled a school trip to the nearby settlement of Eccles, which has almost entirely disappeared into the sea, including its place of worship and burial ground.

“You could see people’s bones,” she said. “Certain people hold this idealized notion that the deceased will just get carried away to the ocean. They won’t. Individuals will collect remains as mementos and go plundering graves looking for valuables. That is completely disrespectful.”

“I fear that the identical fate that happened at Eccles will occur at Happisburgh and there’ll be skeletons on the beach. I would feel appalled by that.”

A Paratrooper's Resting Place in Jeopardy

Along the shoreline is situated the grave of a former paratrooper killed while working abroad. His parent said she lost sleep after learning her son’s final plot might one day be relocated.

“It does trouble me to think this may not remain his permanent resting place,” she said. “To our family it’s an significant site to visit.”

She believes, new burials should stop but says it is premature to disturb current plots. “What I would choose for now is to do nothing and watch carefully, but an timely resolution must be made when a tipping point has been reached.”

Seeking Answers and Clarity

The lack of consensus over when and how to tackle the problem has resulted in bereaved families feeling exasperated and worried.

Some are calling for additional coastal protections to delay the unavoidable loss and to allow funerals to continue for now. Different voices argue the moment for relocation is drawing near.

“It is very emotional,” a family member stated. “The council’s report was really good, but now there’s confusion about how it is implemented. And all parties is avoiding responsibility over who is responsible.”

A local official said the graveyards were under the care of the church authorities. “In the end it is up to them to decide the direction to take. We are here to assist them through that process with residents.”

It was also stated there was time to consider all the choices. “This concerns decades before it begins getting lost.”

“There is no unified opinion on what should happen yet. We need good local conversations to discover the right solutions for each community.”

The possibility of losing the churches and graveyards was described as one of “profound sadness for the area,” but church representatives also spoke of a doctrine in resurrection, offering a spiritual perspective on the physical loss of sacred ground.